Defaming

Ron Musgraves

Exterior Restoration Specialist
Staff member
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Jump to: navigation, search
<!-- start content -->"Libel" and "Slander" redirect here. For other uses, see Libel (disambiguation) and Slander (disambiguation).
"Vilification" redirects here. For the hate crime, see racial vilification.
In law, defamation -- also called calumny, libel (for written words), slander (for spoken words), and vilification -- is the communication of a statement that makes a claim, expressly stated or implied to be factual, that may give an individual, business, product, group, government or nation a negative image. It is usually, but not always,<SUP class=reference id=cite_ref-0>[1]</SUP> a requirement that this claim be false and that the publication is communicated to someone other than the person defamed (the claimant).
In common law jurisdictions, slander refers to a malicious, false and defamatory spoken statement or report, while libel refers to any other form of communication such as written words or images. Most jurisdictions allow legal actions, civil and/or criminal, to deter various kinds of defamation and retaliate against groundless criticism. Related to defamation is public disclosure of private facts, which arises where one person reveals information that is not of public concern, and the release of which would offend a reasonable person. "Unlike [with] libel, truth is not a defence for invasion of privacy."<SUP class=reference id=cite_ref-1>[2]</SUP>
False light laws are "intended primarily to protect the plaintiff's mental or emotional well-being."<SUP class=reference id=cite_ref-martin_2-0>[3]</SUP> If a publication of information is false, then a tort of defamation might have occurred. If that communication is not technically false but is still misleading, then a tort of false light might have occurred.<SUP class=reference id=cite_ref-martin_2-1>[3]</SUP>
 
the explanation above..... was for the following reason ?

Multiple choice:

a. Someone was Defamed
b. Someone was'nt Defamed
c. Someone is on the verge of being Defamed
d. None of the above














.....
 
Last edited:
the explanation above was for the following reason ?

Multiple choice:

a. Someone was Defamed
b. Someone was'nt Defamed
c. Someone is on the verge of being Defamed
d. None of the above
















.....

People should think about the claims they make. If you dont know for sure the intent you could be held accountable.

A.
 
the explanation above was for the following reason ?

Multiple choice:

a. Someone was Defamed
b. Someone was'nt Defamed
c. Someone is on the verge of being Defamed
d. None of the above

.....

Maybe it was because:

a. We were thinking about defaming someone, just did not say it out loud.
b. Someone should have been defamed but did not get defamed.
c. Someone is about to be defamed but the group is still holding back.
d. One of the above.

hahahahaha
 
Back
Top