How would you like to be EPA compliant for less than $1.50 per job?

It is great that the UAMCC is out there in front of the industry helping everyone to be compliant and do the right thing, especially with the newest technology available and at affordable prices. Thanks Tony!

Thanks UAMCC for being there for this industry!
 
I'm pretty sure nothing but flocculation or electrocoagulamation will handle emulsified oil - Not water boy, water maze, nor full size high dollar systems so it is not really a shortcoming.
 
Chris, you could use a shop vac with the pump out feature to capture the runoff and if there is no oil/grease in the water, you could pump it back into the yard so there are no puddles left when you leave. If the bulk of the water has a lot of SH in it, you would have to dilute it a lot with water before pumping into the grass.

If you are removing grease/oil stains, there are oil socks for that if you are only using hot water.
 
I'm pretty sure nothing but flocculation or electrocoagulamation will handle emulsified oil - Not water boy, water maze, nor full size high dollar systems so it is not really a shortcoming.

I have also looked into this a lot and not found anything that really works good when the oil/grease is emulsified. The Electrocoagulation and flocculation will handle it no problem. I was going to build a system on a trailer, a system that would not violate any current patents and would handle about 20-30gpm using different technology on a 16' trailer for large surface cleaning but have changed direction with the business right now, still have info and plans for later use if I go into more of that type of cleaning.
 
Looks like we have another example of the PWNA being behind as usual.

Over on the his board one of the PWNA environmental directors is taking pot shots at our attempts to clean the environment using the best available technology to the maximum extent practicable.

Here is part of his disparaging post:

View attachment 26403

As usual he is months behind the UAMCC. Here is my response to that same inquiry back in March (over 7 months ago)

View attachment 26404


We attacking the problem of PLAZA cleaning. I state that pretty clearly in the first post of this thread.

The gutter critter is filtration that is over and above what is required for plaza cleaning in my area:

http://www.lvstormwater.com/pdfs/bmp_brochure.pdf


In Jim's area (under Basmaa)

http://www.basmaa.org/Portals/0/documents/pdf/Pollution from Surface Cleaning.pdf

And in the other PWNA environmental director's home city:

http://fortworthtexas.gov/uploadedF...uality/Power_Washer_Permit/PowerWasherBMP.pdf



One would think that a method of filtration that exceeds requirements by local laws and does so inexpensively would be something to be celebrated instead of denigrated.

I hope you guys who are also members of the PWNA are watching this. Is this really what you want to be associated with?
I read that over there. with your differences he is going to attack you every chance he gets which is getting pathetic. and he does zero research so that's even more pathetic.
 
I'm pretty sure nothing but flocculation or electrocoagulamation will handle emulsified oil - Not water boy, water maze, nor full size high dollar systems so it is not really a shortcoming.
You can also split it out using hydrochloric acid. It is a pain to do it that way, though.
 
I read that over there. with your differences he is going to attack you every chance he gets which is getting pathetic. and he does zero research so that's even more pathetic.

Too bad more contractors don't open their eyes and see the truth and what is really happening.
 
Chris pressure wash using the socks in the drains to catch hydrocarbons. Rinse the drive then go back and put the sh down to kill mold in poors.

Thanks Kory. I don't know much about driveways or sh.

Sent from my DROID RAZR HD using Tapatalk 2
 
Back
Top