Jeff, I know you are a stand up guy and I take your word for it. I spoke with Mike K and he basically said the same thing. However, just because they contacted the UAMCC first doesn't necessarily mean that it should become involved due to the conflict of interest. When a person that makes their living selling equipment to contractors is the one presenting the case, one can only wonder what the motives are. Sometimes it might be better to step aside to avoid the appearance of being tainted. You know my stance with the uamcc union. I won't trash them if they don't bother me. Live and let live. But now it appears as though they are coming across country to my back yard. I think the thing to do would have been to decline and pass the info on to local contactors to attend and put in input. I take exception to someone I don't know representing me and looking out "my best interest". I just see ulterior motives. Hopefully I am wrong and if so, will admit it. Hope your business is slamming. We are rounding the corner on 350 apartment buildings so far this year and more on the schedule. Life is good.
When this whole ordeal was brought to the doorstep of the UAMCC, at least a couple of us cringed and wanted to bury our heads in the sand. Its a touchy subject but it
is affecting the industry today. I'm not understanding the conflict of interest you speak of William. Conflict with whom? This is a contractor issue and a contractor organization is dealing with it. If not the UAMCC.. who? If not now.. when?
The transition team took a careful approach when responding to Charlotte. Who was going to handle this? Most of the TT was not qualified. Scott Stone was naturally elected as part of the committee as he is more than qualified. When Scott left, the transition team took steps to bring in qualified consultants. Team member Rob Huffman is certified in environmental cleaning and performs primarily commercial cleaning including parking garages, but who else would be willing to work with the organization that had the best credentials and respect in the industry? Michael K is a pitbull for contractor rights and he has been active in attending his local meetings on this topic. So we had our team members..
When Robert Hinderliter's name came into the mix, we hissed as much as any contractor would have. Robert sells reclaim equipment. We grilled Robert via email, personal calls and on a conference call. We talked amongst ourselves and asked the hard questions. We looked carefully at the FW BMP. We educated and brought ourselves up to speed. Robert is undoubtedly qualified to be a consultant on the topic. The Fort Worth BMP allows a contractor to be in compliance for under $500. Its a good start. The Fort Worth standards are on the EPA's website. That's the horse's mouth. You cannot get better than that. keep in mind that consultants consult. They do not make policy.
In the interim other organizations got brought into the fray by the city of Charlotte. Carlos navigated that mine field and here is the result.
Contractors have a voice in this meeting. Short of the egos, the hurt feelings, the cynicism and doubt, isn't that the desired result?? There was a chance that CETA was going to be setting the standards. You wanna talk about agendas? CETA is a fine organization but it represents the sellers of equipment. Bringing in more contractors, networks, experts, and opinions early in the game would have muddied the waters. The city of Charlotte could well have said "F You, you contractors are not organized and you are not worth it. You'll adapt to whatever we say you'll adapt to". I hope people can understand that it could easily have gone that route. Everyone will be able to sit in front of Charlotte and speak their peace because of how the leader of the UAMCC handled the hurdles and kept contractors first and foremost. Whether anyone chooses to believe that or not is on them. Its the truth. Truth doesn't change because someone has an opinion to the contrary.
Charlotte wanted a national organization to come in on this. Nothing less. That is why CETA, the PWNA and the UAMCC were contacted. I'm sure that initial email is still sitting in the UAMCC's inbox. I am no longer on the transition team, I'm just a contractor member so I cannot make this kind of recommendation but maybe it can be made available for the people that seem hellbent on dwelling in the rumor mill? If anyone out there believe the UAMCC approached Charlotte you have to also believe the the PWNA and CETA also had the same game plan from day one. That would be a pretty incredible coincidence?