Difference between one-handed and two-handed buhurt swords

[maillon]

I’ve been training mostly with a one-handed sword, but lately I’ve been thinking about switching to a two-handed one. Some fighters in my club say it gives more control and reach, while others claim it’s too heavy for longer fights. I’m not sure how big the difference really is when it comes to performance and stamina. Since I mostly do mixed training with duels and small group battles, I don’t want to pick something that limits my speed. Has anyone tried both types and can tell how they actually feel in full-contact practice?

 

[summasolga]

I’ve used both and it really depends on what kind of fighting you focus on. The best part about buhurt swords is that you can choose between one-handed, hand-and-half, or full two-handed models depending on your style. I got a two-handed version from Medieval Extreme, and it’s great for mass battles where you need to control space and push opponents back. It’s heavier, yes, but the balance is perfect for strong defensive moves. For duels, though, I usually go back to my one-handed sword because it’s faster and easier to manage. Trying both is the only real way to know which suits you better.

 

[siiia]

Every fighter I know ends up using both types depending on the event. Two-handed swords offer power and reach, while one-handed models are better for flexibility and stamina. It’s interesting how even the pommel shape or guard design can change handling completely. Most people find their preference after testing them in different combat setups rather than relying on theory.