extra krispy
Yes extra krispy.;..... sorry buddy but i hate to bring bad news to you and at the same time get everyone back on track. Yes it was a bad move to begin with telling the customer that the bill was due within 30 days and i will tell you why. There is a distintion between telling a customer he has credit and one that owes you now. Legally now you are f----d because you gave the customer credit by saying due in 30 days instead of saying due upon receipt. You say why is this important, again i will tell you . lets suppose they decide to file for some type of bankrupcy protection. Are you guys with me, now who do you think will get paid first , the one that has a mechanics lien on the property or the one the gave the credit. Now you understand, the wording will keep you from securing a debt with the property and will only be secured by word of mouth. If you ever want to slap a customer with a mechanics lien, to secure your payment, it must include in the terms columm "due upon receipt". Oh and by the way a mayor theater chain in the usa filed last year for bk protection., so you might be out the money anyway. Since I used to deal with this type of information before and know about i can only say this is from my own personal experience and should not be considered advise towards actions you would seek against another individual. Use advise at your own risk. My disclaimer.