CWA Act rules when Sidewalk Cleaning- Simple understanding

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ron Musgraves

Exterior Restoration Specialist
Staff member
First thing thats need to be said here is that this does not apply in circumstances such as Fleet-washing or heavy contaminates known on a surface.

Lets dispel this problem right out of the gate.

Distributors took the fleet-wash guidelines and applied them to everything.

Its pretty simple when your washing a vehicle your not violating the storm water act your just flat polluting the property that your washing the vehicle on. Think about this, if you open your window and throw a bag of trash out on the ground you polluting. Why would you think washing a dirt off a car onto the ground wasn't? ( I hope your Following)

Now when cleaning a Sidewalk are you adding something to your wash thats considered contaminates? Soap, any kind can be considered a pollutant. So if your adding a soap to the wash your polluting.

Now if your just using regular water to wash a walkway from contaminates that are already existing and your not going to Enter waters of the US they in most cities and counties your ok.

You see this pollution is already on property, this pollution now can be reduced by proper methods.

Do you need a Vacuum to reduce these contaminate? No you do not need a vacuum to reduce pollution in this situation. Can a Vacuum be used? Yes there is nothing wrong with using a vacuum in this circumstance. However picking the water can create more problems staying compliant. I know this sounds a bit crazy, once you have received the water, another words you have pumped it into your tanks most laws will tell you that now you need a proper facility to dump. The water in your tanks are now contaminated from possible other wash water you have had and if you dump onsite your possibly cross contaminating. Proper disposal will be required by the laws of your own city,county and State. Hauling the water might even be illegal.

Here are some simple and more practical methods.

Sweeping the large existing debris up before we wash.
Berms diverting water to a retention area.
Filters reducing the existing pollution in the water.
Oil Socks removing the already known oils from parking spaces.
Curb barriers that the already existing contaminates run through and self clean.

All of these above methods reduce the pollution's that is already existing on the property.

At the end of the day we reduce owners liability without creating others such as hauling hazardous materials off there property. We didn't put them at risk by cross contamination with our dirty wash water from that nuclear power plant we just washed earlier that day.

These private property owners want to keep containment.


This is very important as you will use this word now when your asked about your process.

Its pretty simple when you think about it, no one wants something going off there property and polluting or hurting anyone else.
 
Last edited:
Rainwater Discharged off private property.

You will find cites that clean rainwater, you will find cities that have allowed rainwater coming off property. Please I do not want the photos or to be proven wrong I know they exist.

You will find property owners that have built these incorrectly and are now themselves violating the Clean water Act.

Think about this for a Minute?

Why would you think that private owners would not be under the same laws and restrictions we are?

Owners and developers have to comply with the Clean Water Act, some people here think by reclaiming we are keeping them in compliance. Wrong, if compliance already exist we are possibly increasing there liability by picking up known contaminates. ( BAsed On disposal LAWS and process)

Containment private property owners by law have to contain rainwater. If you think every wal-mart parking lot ran to us water you where mistaken. Could you imagine in a large city if all the parking lots flushed into the storm system? What would you think the reservoirs would really look like?

Some sort of contaminate is built in every new and being installed in old development to retain the contaminates from that private property or development.

We as environmental cleaning contractors by reducing the know pollution already existing are protectors of the storm water pollution.

Here's why, if containment is ever preached and owners have us reducing the already known pollution on there property. If containment is compromised the owners themselves are in violation of the Clean Water ACt.

Here's a Large Argument and it will be tested in the future.

NO OFF PROPERTY DISCHARGE!!!!!!!


The CWA was built around this entire premiss.

I have no data when and where this became distorted, but its very apparent the miss-interpretation of the fundamentals have run wild.

Getting back to this was they knew that if they kept industrial users waste onsite making them pretreat the water prior to discharging this would be better than allowing them to pollute river and streams in america.

This worked great, we now can swim again in lake ERIE. WOW we actually have fish.

The problems and this is my opinion is these companies used the no off property slogan as a loop hole. They began pumping the waste water directly into the aquifer. Yes large manufactures where doing this and you can read about it in Arizona by just google Motorola under ground water polluters 52st.

We have to remember that when Laws get changed and made by others they affect what we do.

SO yes when a pressure washing guys is doing something really stupid he is putting the entire industry at risk.
 
Last edited:
Go to administrative and click close thread. I got it done.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top