Relief valve (hot-water waste valve) failure.

gregsfc

New member
I'm an operator of a Mi-TM JCW3504-2MBH; 3500PSI/3.7GPM belt drive for my gov't field station. Honda GX390 and AR pump (not sure of the pump model).

We've learned from past mistakes with pressure washers and have really been meticulous with maintenance and operations especially as it relates to avoiding cavitation, not enough flow, running in by-pass mode, etc.

Out of the blue last week, our pump started leaking opposite the inlet plumbing, out the end of what I now know is called a relief valve. I could tell that it wasn't leaking from around the threads of the valve and was coming out of the end, but since the end sits only about 1/4" from the belt housing frame, I couldn't tell what the end was supposed to be or if something was damaged. The PW'er worked fine the day I discovered the leak except that it took a little longer to purge than normal, but the next day it started losing pressure while a Youth Conservation Corps (YCC) kid was using it. Luckily the kid remembered what I told him about operations of the machine and shut it off immediately when it lost pressure and called someone over to help.

When I got back from my fish distribution trip, I found the part in the manual; called technical support; and the technician said that it usually goes bad if operators are running in by-pass mode too much (we don't; we limit running without spraying to less than one minute intervals max); or it can go bad if some crap gets in to it and can cause it to rupture (possible, but we run it with two filters and the filters, gravity tank and lines were squeaky clean). The technician also stated that they often have to cut the elbow off on the relief valves for these models, because they are so close to the belt housings. Just for reference, our water supply is 45 degrees and it may sit in a tank two or three hours max, so our supply water is not hot in the beginning.

I removed the leaking valve and it was basically flush rubber or plastic end (no elbow) that had a cut mark on it; either from the factory or somehow we accidentally cut it. It had a small hole out the end, but I suspect it's supposed to. I have no way of knowing what the valve end looked like before it started leaking or what caused it to leak, because it can't be seen unless one removes it from our unit. I always assumed that relief-valve bolt was just a bolt, but now I know it's more than just a bolt. We had the new valve over-nighted, and I was able to mount it without cutting the elbow, which was my hope, but it's only about a sixteenth of an inch from the belt housing casing but now the end can be seen because I've pointed the elbow outward towards the crank side of the machine.

The boss really stressed out when the unit went down. He wanted me to Jerry Rigg it some way to keep it going, but I talked him into just waiting till the next afternoon (we've gone down this road before operating machines when we shouldn't have). He gave in and I had it going the next day at the close of business. We really need a second unit, but the bosses boss said we don't have money for it now. We're gov't so we have to wait for piles of money for certain projects and there is no money for the pressure washer project right now. But we are getting a $60K distribution truck to replace a 2007 Int'l we've had to keep buying over an over through repair bills.


My questions are:
Is a relief valve a common part to fail just by happenstance or normal wear?
If this is not a common part to fail, is the technician right about the most likely causes of failure, or is it something else we may be doing or not doing?
I wonder if cutting the elbow off at the factory (if in fact it was cut off like the technician suggested), if that practice could weaken this part and cause it to fail after only a few months of use?
Is there a risk of leaving this relief valve on the unit unmodified if it is extremely close to the belt housing? I'm almost scared to cut the thing like I suspect the factory did, because then I may have a second leaking valve. We overnighted two of them, and it was $60.

https://www.google.com/search?q=mi-...ChMI77eonq2NxgIVQ5eACh3qrABh&biw=1280&bih=648
 
Its called an overheat protection device, if the water gets too hot it generally starts leaking for safety. Most guys get rid of them and put a plug in to replace the valve. You are off a tank if I remember right, bypass back to the tank and then you can get rid of that safety valve.
 
Okay. Thanks. And you're right; we're running 100% gravity feed off of a 330-gallon IBC tote with no continuous water supply available due to the distances we use the machine from our city water. I've got the tank slightly elevated (maybe 4-5 inches from the washer inlet) and am using a 1" i.d. on a forklift-able platform. I've read before about returning the water back to the tank when in by-pass mode, and I know this is the way the pros normally set it up, but I've not yet looked in to the details of it and how to best accomplish this with my IBC tote and a standard cap.

So I'm assuming that most likely culprit causing the failure was that someone who is operating the machine is still letting it run too much in by-pass mode. We've got one problem employee that doesn't seem to want to listen to and take the precautions that I've communicated about our pressure washer beyond what we used to do before we learned more about pressure washers. In fact, he seems to be particularly reckless and careless when using our pressure washer...it's a long story, but lets just say it's complicated, so it's not easy to remedy this problem with this employee and his attitude about the pressure washer, and he is one of our most productive pressure washer operators. So it is possible this still happens even though everyone knows to shut the machine off when in by-pass mode.

I'll have to set up a return system for the bypass. I'm not the most mechanical person in the world, but out of necessity, due to all the maintenance needs around the hatchery, and the fact that we don't have a dedicated maintenance person or time set aside for maintenance like I think we should have, and due to the fact that none of the other workers are willing to put in extra time or effort to keep things going, I'll have to figure the plumbing details out on my own time, get the admin assistant to order the parts, and then steal some time during a few lunches to put it together. All the workers on the hatchery are subordinate to the guy responsible for raising fish. You can think of it as production; sort of like a factory. Our supervisor is like a production manager, so he wants 100% of our time towards helping him grow fish. It would be like a factory running with no maintenance team, and then a couple of the workers on the assembly line trying to get away from the line to maintain things so the line can keep running while not slowing the line . It's not really a good way to run a factory or a fish hatchery either; but we're gov't, and most of the time the focus isn't on doing things the smartest or most productive way. It's more about doing things the bosses way.
 

Attachments

  • PW contraption.jpg
    PW contraption.jpg
    169.4 KB · Views: 16
Hey Greg,..It's not hard at all. Let the cap alone and you can simply drill a hole in the top of the tank,..run the by-pass hose through,..and put some sort of plastic end on it that's full flow(open),..this stops it from jumping back out of the tank. This by-pass hose connects to the unloader,..just replace the one that is there now. Very simple.

Jeff
 
Thanks Jeff. When I can get freed from the grind, I'll get that set up. And on our new one too!

We just got approval to get a second unit. This is great news. I've got some ideas on how to make a more simple and better platform that I learned from building and living with the first one. One of the main differences is that I'm going to run my plumbing from the tank to the machine with a couple of elbows so that it's not doing that long, looping, drooping curved path like one can see in the picture. Also, it'll have a step built in so that when we fill it with water, we can step up even with the base of the IBC tote. If I get enough time, I'll upgrade the plumbing on the first unit too.

The new machine will help make it better too. It's got a built-in roll-cage frame with an added-on gas tank for 4-times the run time. It's a Pressure Pro but has the same engine and pump, so we should get the same performance. The frame will give it a ready-made spot for our hose reel, so I won't have to build a second platform for the reel. We'll get the same reel; it's been working good for us. It's a Coxreel 250'; nearly as cheap as a 100' capacity reel and gives us plenty of extra space for a not-so-great roll up of our 100' of hose.

I'll lobby to get some time to get both of these set up with the return line back to the tank. Maybe find a youtube video.
 
I have been fixing pressure washers for 24 years an I have always hated those things. They call them Pump savers. They have a Bi-metal disc inside. When the temperature gets to 140 deg they are suppose to open up and let cold water cool the pump down. They just don't work. Most of my cavitation problems on a pump is caused by this device malfunctioning and sucking air into the pump inlet. I remove them as soon as I see them. Even on brand new machines from the factory before I sell them to a customer. A long bypass line or bypass to a water tank is the best solution..
 
I have been fixing pressure washers for 24 years an I have always hated those things. They call them Pump savers. They have a Bi-metal disc inside. When the temperature gets to 140 deg they are suppose to open up and let cold water cool the pump down. They just don't work.


I wondered about that once I saw it taken off. Looked and saw some orifices or something inside and just wondered what level of sophistication it would take for one of those to truly sense 140 degrees and suspected that they really aren't sophisticated enough to do that. No thermostat or anything.

The boss said "no" to the return line to the tank from the bypass, and "no" to building a second platform. He said we'd put the machine on one pallet and the tank on another, and I guess we'll move the other needed equipment on a pickup truck, so that we can make three trips just to set up before going to work instead of just one trip. And also, setting it up this way (we've done it this way before), we'll have to make sure we put the two units close together so the tank and machine are not too spread out beyond the reach of the supply line, and we'll have to connect and disconnect each time we move to one work location to another and re purge each time.

There was a time when we would rollup our hoses from two pressure washers and other equipment and load the equipment and hoses in a pickup truck; roll our pressure washers from one location to another one at a time; come back and fill up and move the water truck; come back and move the pickup truck; unload all the equipment; re-prime the hoses; hook back up; fill with gas; and start the next raceway. We had two, 2.3 GPM pressure washers, and it took two people almost as much time to get one done as it does one person and one machine now and four times as long to move from one location to the other. And back then the bosses thought there was nothing wrong with doing it the way we used to do it, and they couldn't and still can't understand why I want to make it more productive.

Basically, I'll just ignore them like usual and keep making it better, but I'll have to do it on my own time. Thanks for the help and advice.
 
You could hook the Bypass lines to the tank with Quick couplers so they can detach easily for each move.
 
You could hook the Bypass lines to the tank with Quick couplers so they can detach easily for each move.

Thanks!

I'll get a plan and get equipment together and sneak in one day when the boss is gone and get it done. Whenever I make an upgrade like that, we never regret it, but sometimes I can't ask permission, because then I'm told not to do it. Must be a gov't thing; or maybe just our hatchery culture.

I've been thinking about why he might have said no to a second platform. It could be that he doesn't want me to spend the time on it, because he's pretty controlling (of course that's his job as a manager); but the more I think about it (since I work around what he needs from me anyway), I think that he and the rest of the crew is scared of it. They don't like driving the forklift in reverse and they can't see around the pallet when going forward. They don't have a forklift-operating background like I do, but anyone with a brain can tell it makes much more sense to be able to move all your equipment, and leave it all hooked up and ready to go than it does to make three trips and re hook it up each time, especially if your moving locations every couple of hours like we do.

The boss and I need to have a talk so we can understand each other and I can better understand what he wants and expects, but it'll have to wait till after his vacation when he'll be more receptive. He seems aggravated every time I or anyone else talks to him lately about anything. He just wants raceways pressure washed in a hurry to get to the next step of fish production. Sometimes he doesn't understand all the little things it takes to get the big things done and get those little things done quickly like he wants. I'm trying to take care of the little things, and I think he thinks some of these little things are unnecessary or too complicated. But now is not the time to find out why he's been holding me back lately. He's not in a communicating mood if you know what I mean.
 
Back
Top